jcapriotti wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:06 am

mirisj wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:33 pm I had such high hopes that this forum wouldn't end up in a part numbering discussion rat-hole...

You do realize the type of people here that Matt attracts, the degenerates of the CAD world.

Damn good point, Jason.

I had such high hopes that this forum wouldn't end up in a part numbering discussion rat-hole... I wish I could still access that post from years ago about part numbering as it was a work of art. Succinct. Perfect. In a nutshell, my argument was that a part number is nothing more than a placeholder ...

One of my most memorable meetings with John McEleney was at SolidWorks World 2007(?) in New Orleans. While I don't recall the exact conversation (I may have been a bit inebriated - it was the last year they had hard alcohol at the Tuesday night event), I do know that my usual brutal honest rose up a...

Congrats Glenn!
I have 2 myself - Jaxon (4) and Ariah (2). Getting a big hug from a grandchild is a feeling like no other.

Yeah, ok. You see, I was being sarcastic, and it didn't work in print. The sarcasm thing is obviously NOT a rule. I just wanted to make that a suggestion. I thought that was obvious, but see, I can be wrong too. I've used the purple text before and I think it worked, and gives you another level of ...

... I tend to agree with @matt that sometimes SW files accumulate artefacts that cannot be purged. Maybe a saveas could help? It's too bad we don't have more folks from "the old days" here. We went through a lot of these issues and had some sort of fix for them. I think @SolidMuse Anna Wo...

I really dont like rule number 5. If i want to be sarcastic , last thing i wanna do is be so obvious. Yeah, ok. You see, I was being sarcastic, and it didn't work in print. The sarcasm thing is obviously NOT a rule. I just wanted to make that a suggestion. I thought that was obvious, but see, I can...